Free Will Vs Determinism Essay
The apparent contrast between the theories of free will and determinism has been ane incessant debate that has attracted philosophers and theorists for many years.
The debate itself in regards to criminal behaviour surrounds the central question, 'is our behaviour, including criminal actions, something we freely choose to do by an act of our own will or is our behaviour largely determined by forces beyond our immediate self control. These factors are primarily thought to include our biological make-up, family environment, socio-economic status and the laws of nature (Bartol, 1995). This debate is important to Criminology as it holds the key to prediction of risk and therefore prediction of crime. There are three major stances on determinism that are known as hard determinism, soft determinism and non-determinism (also known as free will) (Williams, 1991).
The key issue stemming from the debate about free will v determinism stems from the issue of taking and accepting responsibility of ones actions and behaviour. Responsibility can be broken down into two essential components: control and understanding (Williams, 1991).
Hard determinism is the belief that our actions are actually controlled or impelled by forces beyond our immediate decision making process'. It completely dismisses the idea of free will as an illusion and that no act including criminal behaviour can be seen as an act of free will. It states that every event is directly caused and it is the aim of criminology to uncover the causes of criminal behaviour, with the possibility of being able to predict and therefore control criminal behaviour and crime (Campbell, 1994).
Hard determinism takes a number of forms in the manner of biological, sociological and psychological determinism. It is the firmly held belief of determinists that we are pre-ordained by either our biological inheritance, early child hood memories held in the psyche, or the particular social environment we are either fortunately or unfortunately born into. Hard determinists believe that after extensive research they will be able to determine and predict human behaviour and in particular criminal behaviour (Bartol, 1995).
The hard determinism stance also serves as an escape clause by removing blame from criminals because they hold no control over their actions, therefore removing the need for punishment (Campbell, 1994). As identified an essential element of the debate is the control and understanding aspect and to punish criminals who can neither understand nor control their behaviour would be the ultimate cruelty Campbell, 1994). An alternative mechanism is then offered in the form of treatment and assistance to those suffering as a result of their...
Loading: Checking Spelling0%
Free Will vs. Determinism Essay1833 words - 7 pages Picture yourself in line in the cafeteria, you have two main dishes to choose from: pizza or a plate of fierce-looking meatloaf, so you decide to go with pizza. So was your decision based off of free will or was this decision predetermined? To fully understand whether your actions resulted from free will or determinism, we must first define each. Determinism is the idea that everything happens due to a cause or a determinant, which is something...
Free Will vs. Determinism Essay2766 words - 11 pages I. Determinism Before one can properly evaluate the entire debate that enshrouds the Free Will/Determinism, each term must have a meaning, but before we explore the meaning of each term, we must give a general definition. Determinism is, "Everything that happens is caused to happen. (Clifford Williams. "
Free Will Versus Determinism1000 words - 4 pages Free Will Versus Determinism The controversy between free will and determinism has been argued about for years. What is the difference between the two? Looking in a dictionary, free will is the power, attributed to human beings, of making free choices that are unconstrained by external circumstances or by an agency such as fate or divine will. Free will allows free choice. Yet, determinism is the total opposite. Determinism has this...
Free Will And Determinism679 words - 3 pages Gregg Andrews Phi 130 November 1, 2001 Writing Assignment 2 Free Will And Determinism The problem of free will and determinism has troubled the mind of man since time began. The reason it is a problem is that no one knows the truth. There are two sides to this issue. One side says, "Everything in the universe is governed by causal laws." This view is called
Free Will versus Determinism1308 words - 5 pages "To be or not to be, this is the question" . In this famous and well known statement Shakespeare opens an enormous number of questions and reflections about life. Through many years ordinary people and remarkable philosophers have debated about this quandary. So many dilemmas have been raised around this issue such as: what is the meaning for "to be", weather the life is real or merely a dream, to be existent or not, and so on. Maybe the most...
Free Will Determinism1448 words - 6 pages Every day in our lives and everything we do involves some degree of decision making or choice selection either mental or physical. We start making choices and decisions from the moment we wake up everyday to the second we sleep. Some decisions we make are blatantly obvious to ourselves because of our need to reflect on the choices before choosing. However, most decisions we make throughout the day are made without...
Free Will v. Determinism863 words - 3 pages Do we really have Freewill? The topic of freewill vs. determinism has always been something that has interested me. I follow the Christian faith very strongly but my views on the subject vary almost daily. The concept of freewill and determinism is something that, as a Christian, I often struggle with. By no means do I think that I have all the answers or that I am right. I believe that in order to find the truth...
Free Will and Determinism Views1954 words - 8 pages The aim of this essay is to prove the reliability of and why Libertarianism is the most coherent of the three Free Will and Determinism views. It refers to the idea of human free will being true, that one is not determined, and therefore, they are morally responsible. In response to the quote on the essay, I am disagreeing with Wolf. This essay will be further strengthened with the help of such authors as C.A. Campell, R. Taylor and R.M....
Free Will, Determinism, and Responsibility946 words - 4 pages Free Will, Determinism, and Responsibility There are many events in a person's life that have an impact so large, that the person' life is forever changed. Hopefully most such events are positive, and help him in his life. However, there is also the undeniable fact that bad things happen. It is not uncommon to hear someone wondering aloud why an event took place. A person's actions come into question, and it is wondered what the...
Free will & Determinism - The debate.1797 words - 7 pages A.The apparently contrasting theories of free will and determinism has been an endless debate that has plagued philosophers for thousands of years.There are various definitions of free will, this has led to difficulty in applying it to human behaviour. Philosophers such as Plato, Kant and Descartes have all acknowledge the existence of free will, to a varying degree. The exercise of free will consists of making choices from a...
Free will, determinism and fatalism.1533 words - 6 pages According to the notes and the discussion in class we have seen that fatalism means "that certain events are fated to happen no matter what we want or do", therefore assuming that there is nothing that we can do to stop it from happening. Hosper is a believer of the fatalism; he argues that we are all determined to behave in a certain way according to the psychological laws. I would have to agree with Hosper, if he refers to those certain...
Psychoanalysis was the first major modern school of psychology. Sigmund Freud, the founder and major exponent of psychoanalytic theory, believed fervently that most individuals’ though processes are unconscious (1940). He taught that one’s actions and personality are a result of conflict between the id, an unconscious component of the psyche that follows the pleasure principal, and the superego and ego, rational and idealistic forces that seek to control the id (Freud, 1923). Other unconscious influences on the mind include eros, and thanatos, two conflicting internal desires, to reproduce and to die, respectively. They also believe that all human behaviour is ultimately driven by the prime psychic force, libido, or sexual energy, and that powerful social taboos related to certain sexual impulses cause many of our desires and memories to be repressed. These are the fundamental principles of psychoanalysis.
The humanistic approach, arguably the “third wave’ of psychology”, is comprised of numerous theories, distinct, though related, theories. It had its roots in the existentialist musings of Sartre, Heidegger, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, and others. It arose in the infamous 1960s, largely as a result of perceived flaws the existing schools of psychology, psychoanalysis and behaviourism, which were seen by many as holding an overly derogatory, reductionist, and mechanistic view of humans. Because its theories are impossible to either prove or falsify, humanist psychology is now seen more as a philosophy or counselling approach than science. As the various pioneers of humanistic psychology were individual people, there is no single accepted theory of humanism. There are, however, numerous consistent themes. These can be very briefly summarised by James Bugental’s five postulates of Humanistic Psychology, that:
- 1. Human beings cannot be reduced to components.
- 2. Human beings have in them a uniquely human context.
- 3. Human consciousness includes an awareness of oneself in the context of other people.
- 4. Human beings have choices and responsibilities.
- 5. Human beings are intentional, they seek meaning, value and creativity. (Bugental, 1964)
This essay will examine the views of these two major psychological movements on two perplexing psychological debates, nature versus nurture, and freewill versus determinism. The aurally gratifying idiom “nature versus nurture” is fairly self-explanatory, referring to the debate over whether one’s upbringing or heredity plays a larger role in determining his/her eventual demeanour. The “freewill versus determinism” debate is slightly more complicated. In psychology, it refers to the question of whether an individual has control over his/her behaviour and understands the motives behind it (Freedom), or if his/her behaviour is determined by some force over which he/she has no control (Determinism), such as his/her genetics or upbringing. Followers of both schools believe both nature and nurture to play an important role in the development of ones personality, and, through that, ones behaviour, whilst psychoanalysts tend to believe in determinism, largely as a result of perceived unconscious influences on the psyche, and humanists in free will.
Psychoanalysts contend that humans have base instincts, hereditary unconscious urges that are fundamental to the determination of how we act. Sigmund Freud expounded that people are fundamentally driven by inherited unconscious, instinctual, animalistic urges, primarily lust, eros, and aggression, thanatos (1920). Additionally, he believed in id, a primitive, passionate, irrational psychic force that dwells in the unconscious, and is driven by the pleasure principle (Freud, 1923). Id “contains everything that is inherited, that is present at birth, that is laid down in the constitution” (Freud, 1940). In other words, it is hereditary. Thus nature is an important element of psychoanalytic personality theory.
Curiously, certain other significant elements of psychodynamic teachings assert that nurture plays a more important role in determining one’s behaviour. A notable example of this is Sigmund Freud’s “five psychosexual stages of personality development” (Freud, 1905). This theory states that one’s upbringing, specifically whether or not he/she receives adequate stimulation in various distinct erogenous zones during each of the five stages, determines his/her adult personality and behaviour (ibid.). For example, an individual who becomes fixated during the oral stage, early infancy, is likely to be overly demanding later in life (ibid). Additionally, although id, which Freud believed people to be born with, is thought by psychoanalysts to be a significant factor in determining the behaviour of an individual, one’s ego and superego are also believed to be important. One’s ego and superego develop according to his/her nurture, specifically his/her interactions with his/her parents, and with the world in general.
Humanists are in agreement with followers of Psychoanalysis, in that they both believe both nature and nurture to play a role in determining ones eventual countenance. However, followers of the humanistic school of psychology put far more emphasis on nurture than do psychoanalysts, stressing that one learns about the world through personal experiences (Maslow, 1987). Additionally, they believe the positive or negative evaluations of others to be a crucial factor in the shaping of one’s personality (Rogers, 1951), further illustrating their faith in nurture. However, they also consider one’s capacity to fulfil his/her full potential to be subject to certain “constraints imposed by heredity” (Elias & Merriam, 1980,). Their belief in peoples’ inherent antecedent tendencies to self-actualise (Rogers, 1951) is another example of the importance of heredity in humanistic personality psychology.
The concept of psychic determinism is one of psychoanalysis’s major assumptions. Freud (1940) asserted that everything we do, think, or feel has a meaning and purpose, and that gestures, slips of the tongue, mistakes, everything, has a meaning, and nothing is accidental. These seemingly innocuous gaffes, he theorized, are in fact a result of unconscious area of the mind, a “deep, inaccessible repository of urges or drives[that] are the major determinants of behaviour” 1 , of which all individuals are unaware (Freud, 1938).
Also supporting the notion that psychoanalysts tend to believe in determinism rather than freewill are Freud’s tripartite model of the psyche, his belief in instincts, and his concept of the five psychosexual stages. Freud (1923) theorized that the mind is composed of three sections that cut across the conscious/unconscious/preconscious regions, the id, the ego, and the superego. An unconscious internal battle between the ego and superego, and the id is said to determine one’s behaviour and personality (ibid.). Additionally, Eros and Thanatos, the life and death instincts, are believed by psychoanalysts to be an influential unconscious factor in determining one’s behaviour. Finally, as aforementioned, Freud theorized that one’s personality partially shaped by the five psychosexual stages, over which one has very little control.
Conversely, humanistic theories emphasise that people are freely choosing beings, who consciously exercise control over their own destinies. Two pillars of humanistic psychology are that “Human beings have choices and responsibilities [and that] Human beings are intentional” (Bugental, 1964). Other components of humanistic theory are similarly pro-free will. They do, however, acknowledge that the mind is strongly influenced by societal, biological, and subconscious forces, contending that “human beings [make] significant personal choices within the constraints imposed by heredity, personal history, and environment” (Elias & Merriam, 1980). Nevertheless, they emphasise “the independent dignity and worth of human beings and their conscious capacity to develop personal competence and self respect.” 2
Freud’s psychodynamic theory forces, irrational thoughts, and the lasting impressions left by childhood experiences, whilst humanistic theories tend to emphasize one’s rational thought processes and inherent striving to reach his/her full potential. Psychodynamic theory is therefore heavily supportive of determinism, whilst humanist theories, though they acknowledge that external influences are an important factor shaping one’s behaviour, believe in freewill. Elements of psychodynamic theory believe heredity to be an important force shaping behaviour and personality, whilst others emphasises the importance of one’s upbringing, curious, considering that they were all postulated by the same person. Humanistic theories too contend that both nature and nurture are important, probably owing to the fact that they were formulated by a variety of different people, although they generally place more emphasis on nurture.
1 Phares, Jerry “Introduction to Personality”.